Comments on: Pacemaker/Corosync/OpenAIS/OCFS2/GFS2 for Ubuntu 10.04 http://blog.init.hr/?p=146 Insight into thoughts of Init Crew Tue, 01 May 2012 11:32:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Ante Karamatić http://blog.init.hr/?p=146&cpage=1#comment-196 Ante Karamatić Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:38:28 +0000 http://blog.init.hr/?p=146#comment-196 Thanks, typo corrected. Distributed lock management on bigger number of machines can be painful :) Thanks, typo corrected.

Distributed lock management on bigger number of machines can be painful :)

]]> By: GNa http://blog.init.hr/?p=146&cpage=1#comment-195 GNa Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:24:32 +0000 http://blog.init.hr/?p=146#comment-195 Hi, Typo OCFS8 -> OCFS2 , but as I see you created the wiki too, so i suggest to correct there also, so the link here points to the right position. I have some experiences with OCFS2 and Hardy up to Jaunty and that stack was a pain for using it as a storage filesystem with my web hosting service, kernel oops-es, big preformance problems. But i used it not on a 2 node drbd8 but on a fiber channel SAN unit with about 8 nodes. I'm open to discussion Hi, Typo OCFS8 -> OCFS2 , but as I see you created the wiki too, so i suggest to correct there also, so the link here points to the right position.

I have some experiences with OCFS2 and Hardy up to Jaunty and that stack was a pain for using it as a storage filesystem with my web hosting service, kernel oops-es, big preformance problems. But i used it not on a 2 node drbd8 but on a fiber channel SAN unit with about 8 nodes.

I’m open to discussion

]]>